Home

Transforming How Engineers, Scientists, and Policymakers Navigate Human-Environmental Systems

Today’s most pressing infrastructure and environmental challenges — from climate-driven drought and urban heat to energy transition and systemic inequities — are not simply engineering problems. They are human-environmental systems problems: complex, dynamic, and uncertain, with deep interdependencies across ecological, technological, and social domains. The Blue-Green Decisions Lab confronts these challenges by advancing systems-based, interdisciplinary approaches to infrastructure resilience, sustainable resource management, and human-centered design. 

Bluegreen Decisions Lab logo

Focusing on decision support at the water-energy nexus, the lab integrates methods from systems engineering, environmental science, data analytics, and behavioral research. It combines model-based and data-driven insights with participatory, stakeholder-engaged processes to support decisions that are not only technically optimal, but also contextually informed and socially attuned. Our work spans utility operations, community-scale planning, policy design, and adaptive governance — always with a commitment to translating science into real-world impact. 

Our approach combines: 

  1. Systems modeling and resilience analytics to better understand coupled infrastructure and ecological dynamics under uncertainty; 
  2. AI-augmented and human-in-the-loop decision tools that enhance judgment and transparency in complex planning contexts; 
  3. Empirical and conceptual work on the human dimensions of engineering, including behavioral modeling, risk perception, institutional decision-making, and stakeholder engagement; 
  4. Design and evaluation of nature-based solutions that align built infrastructure with ecological function and community priorities. 

Navigating Interdependent Water-Energy Systems

Water and energy systems are increasingly interconnected through their infrastructure, operations, and shared exposure to climate and social stressors. Changes in one system — such as electricity load variability or drought-driven supply restrictions — propagate through the other, often in nonlinear and unexpected ways. Yet these coupled dynamics remain underrepresented in real-world infrastructure planning and decision support. 

We are developing systems-based models and analytics to understand, simulate, and visualize these interdependencies. By integrating operational data, behavioral insights, and long-range planning scenarios, our work supports multi-utility coordination, adaptive infrastructure investment, and improved resilience assessment. Early-stage modeling and decision analysis are essential to anticipate emergent vulnerabilities and identify leverage points for integrated water-energy planning. 

Joshua Oluwatumise visiting a site

Human-Centered Infrastructure Design and Governance

Conventional infrastructure models often treat human behavior as noise or constraint. But infrastructure systems are socio-technical by nature: their performance, resilience, and legitimacy depend fundamentally on human decision-makers, users, institutions, and communities. As infrastructure becomes more complex and digitally augmented, understanding and supporting human roles becomes more critical. 

Our work develops and applies models of decision-making, risk perception, institutional behavior, and stakeholder engagement within engineering contexts. We study how cognitive, organizational, and political dynamics shape decisions under uncertainty, and how system design can better reflect human capabilities and limitations. This includes work on embedded AI, decision visualization, and the localization of operational and policy decisions. The goal is to reframe infrastructure not only as a technical system, but as a space of evolving human decision and interaction. 

Dixie Poteet with a construction demonstration. Demonstration includes small construction vehicles and buildings in a modeled dirt pit.

Nature-Based Solutions and Ecological Integration

Nature-based solutions offer promising alternatives to conventional approaches, with potential benefits for biodiversity, community health, and long-term resilience. However, these solutions introduce new complexities into infrastructure planning, particularly around performance uncertainty, ecological feedbacks, and institutional coordination. 

We investigate how nature-based infrastructure can be better modeled, evaluated, and governed as part of broader systems. This includes the development of methods to quantify ecological co-benefits, optimize performance under uncertainty, and incorporate stakeholder values in design and implementation. The challenge is not only technical; it is also epistemic and institutional, requiring new frameworks for aligning ecological knowledge with engineering decision processes. 

Dixie Poteet taking notes while preforming field work
Building a New Generation of Systems Thinkers

Meeting today’s infrastructure challenges requires new capabilities in engineering education and practice. As systems become more integrated, data-intensive, and participatory, engineers and scientists must be equipped to work across disciplinary boundaries, interpret complex feedbacks, and engage with the social dimensions of their work. 

The Blue-Green Decisions Lab is committed to cultivating the next generation of systems thinkers through interdisciplinary research, mentorship, and experiential learning. Students and collaborators work on real-world infrastructure problems involving decision-support modeling, human behavior, stakeholder engagement, and resilience planning. Through this training, we aim to build capacity for a new kind of infrastructure professional: one who understands not just how systems function, but how they fail, adapt, and evolve — and how people shape them along the way. 

Josh Rodriguez, and Joshua Oluwatumise at the 2024 Children's Water Festival. They are preforming a demonstration about dams and hydraulic power for a group of elementary students.