CE322 Basic Hydrology
Jorge A. Ramírez
Unit
Hydrographs
1. Obtain a Unit Hydrograph for a basin of
282.6 km2 of area using the rainfall and streamflow data tabulated
below.
|
Time (h) |
Observed Hydrograph (m3/s) |
|
0 |
160 |
|
1 |
150 |
|
2 |
350 |
|
3 |
800 |
|
4 |
1200 |
|
5 |
900 |
|
6 |
750 |
|
7 |
550 |
|
8 |
350 |
|
9 |
225 |
|
10 |
150 |
|
11 |
140 |
|
Time (h) |
Gross Precipitation (GRH) (cm/h) |
|
0 - 1 |
0.25 |
|
1 - 2 |
2.75 |
|
2 - 3 |
2.75 |
|
3 - 4 |
0.25 |
In this process: use the horizontal
straight-line method to separate baseflow.
Empirical
Unit Hydrograph Derivation
1.
Separate
the baseflow from the observed streamflow hydrograph in order to obtain the
Direct Runoff Hydrograph (DRH).
For this example, use the horizontal line
method to separate the baseflow. From observation of the hydrograph data, the
streamflow at the start of the rising limb of the hydrograph is 150 m3/s.
Thus, use 150 m3/s as the baseflow.
2.
Compute the
volume of Direct Runoff. This volume must be equal to the volume of the Effective
Rainfall Hyetograph (ERH).

Thus, for this example:
VDRH = (200+650+1050+750+600+400+200+75) m3/s
(3600) s = 14'130,000 m3
3.
Express VDRH in equivalent units of
depth:
VDRH in equivalent units of depth = VDRH/Abasin =
14'130,000 m3/(282600000 m2) = 0.05 m = 5 cm.
4.
Obtain a
Unit Hydrograph by normalizing the DRH. Normalizing implies dividing the
ordinates of the DRH by the VDRH
in equivalent units of depth.
|
Time (h) |
Observed Hydrograph (m3/s) |
Direct Runoff Hydrograph (DRH) (m3/s) |
Unit Hydrograph (m3/s/cm) |
|
0 |
160 |
10 |
-- |
|
1 |
150 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
350 |
200 |
40 |
|
3 |
800 |
650 |
130 |
|
4 |
1200 |
1050 |
210 |
|
5 |
900 |
750 |
150 |
|
6 |
750 |
600 |
120 |
|
7 |
550 |
400 |
80 |
|
8 |
350 |
200 |
40 |
|
9 |
225 |
75 |
15 |
|
10 |
150 |
0 |
0 |
|
11 |
140 |
0 |
0 |

5.
Determine
the duration D of the ERH associated with the UH obtained in 4. In order to do this:
a)
Determine
the volume of losses, VLosses
which is equal to the difference between the volume of gross rainfall, VGRH, and the volume of the
direct runoff hydrograph, VDRH
.
VLosses = VGRH
- VDRH = (0.25 + 2.75 +
2.75 +0.25) cm/h 1 h - 5 cm = 1 cm
b)
Compute the
f-index
equal to the ratio of the volume of losses to the rainfall duration, tr. Thus,
f-index = VLosses/tr
= 1 cm / 4 h = 0.25 cm/h
c)
Determine
the ERH by subtracting the infiltration (e.g.,
f-index)
from the GRH:
|
Time (h) |
Effective Precipitation (ERH) (cm/h) |
|
0 - 1 |
0.0 |
|
1 - 2 |
2.5 |
|
2 - 3 |
2.5 |
|
3 - 4 |
0.0 |
As observed in the table, the duration of
the effective rainfall hyetograph is 2 hours. Thus, D = 2 hours, and the Unit
Hydrograph obtained above is a 2-hour Unit Hydrograph. Therefore, it can be
used to predict runoff from precipitation events whose effective rainfall
hyetographs can be represented as a sequence of uniform intensity (rectangular)
pulses each of duration D. This is accomplished by using the principles of
superposition and proportionality, encoded in the discrete convolution
equation:

where Qn
is the nth ordinate of the DRH, Pm
is the volume of the mth rainfall pulse expressed in units of
equivalent depth (e.g., cm or in),
and Un-m+1 is the (n-m+1)th
ordinate of the UH, expressed in units of m3/s/cm.
2. For the basin of Problem 1, predict the
total streamflow hydrograph that would be observed as a result of a storm whose
effective rainfall is tabulated below. Use the same value of baseflow as for
Problem 1.
|
Time (h) |
Effective Precipitation (ERH) (cm/h) |
|
0 - 1 |
1.0 |
|
1 - 2 |
1.0 |
|
2 - 3 |
1.5 |
|
3 - 4 |
1.5 |
|
4 - 5 |
0.75 |
|
5 - 6 |
0.75 |
|
6 - 7 |
0.25 |
|
7 - 8 |
0.25 |
As observed in the table, the ERH can
be decomposed into a sequence of rectangular pulses, each of 2 hours duration.
Thus, we can use the 2-hour UH obtained in Problem
1. To do so:
1.
Determine
the volume of each ERH pulse, Pm,
expressed in units of equivalent depth:
|
Time (h) |
Pm (cm) |
|
0 - 2 |
2.0 |
|
2 - 4 |
3.0 |
|
4 - 6 |
1.5 |
|
6 - 8 |
0.5 |
2.
Use
superposition and proportionality principles:
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Time(h) |
UH (m3/s/cm) |
P1*UH (m3/s) |
P2*UH (m3/s) |
P3*UH (m3/s) |
P4*UH (m3/s) |
DRH (m3/s) |
Total (m3/s) |
|
1 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
150.00 |
|
2 |
40.00 |
80.00 |
|
|
|
80.00 |
230.00 |
|
3 |
130.00 |
260.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
260.00 |
410.00 |
|
4 |
210.00 |
420.00 |
120.00 |
|
|
540.00 |
690.00 |
|
5 |
150.00 |
300.00 |
390.00 |
0.00 |
|
690.00 |
840.00 |
|
6 |
120.00 |
240.00 |
630.00 |
60.00 |
|
930.00 |
1080.00 |
|
7 |
80.00 |
160.00 |
450.00 |
195.00 |
0.00 |
805.00 |
955.00 |
|
8 |
40.00 |
80.00 |
360.00 |
315.00 |
20.00 |
775.00 |
925.00 |
|
9 |
15.00 |
30.00 |
240.00 |
225.00 |
65.00 |
560.00 |
710.00 |
|
10 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
120.00 |
180.00 |
105.00 |
405.00 |
555.00 |
|
11 |
|
|
45.00 |
120.00 |
75.00 |
240.00 |
390.00 |
|
12 |
|
|
0.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
120.00 |
270.00 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
22.50 |
40.00 |
62.50 |
212.50 |
|
14 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
170.00 |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
7.50 |
7.50 |
157.50 |
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
150.00 |
a)
Columns 2 -
5: Apply the proportionality principle to scale the UH by the actual volume of
the corresponding rectangular pulse, Pm.
Observe that the resulting hydrographs are lagged so that their origins
coincide with the time of occurrence of the corresponding rainfall pulse.
b)
Column 6:
Apply the superposition principle to obtain the DRH by summing up Columns 2 -
5.
c)
Column 7:
Add back the baseflow in order to obtain the Total Streamflow Hydrograph.

3. Use the 1-h Unit Hydrograph tabulated
below to predict the total streamflow hydrograph that would be observed as a
result of a storm whose effective rainfall is also tabulated below. Use the
same value of baseflow as for Problem 1. Obtain the solution using the
S-Hydrograph method.
|
Time (h) |
1-H Unit Hydrograph (m3/s/cm) |
|
1 |
0.00 |
|
2 |
40.00 |
|
3 |
130.00 |
|
4 |
210.00 |
|
5 |
150.00 |
|
6 |
120.00 |
|
7 |
80.00 |
|
8 |
40.00 |
|
9 |
15.00 |
|
10 |
0.00 |
|
Time (h) |
Effective Precipitation (ERH) (cm/h) |
|
0 - 3 |
1.0 |
|
3 - 6 |
2.0 |
|
6 - 9 |
1.5 |
The
ERH is composed of 3 rectangular pulses of 3-hour duration each. Thus, we need
a 3-h Unit Hydrograph. Since the only available hydrograph is a 1-h Unit
Hydrograph, we need to develop a new 3-h UH using the S-Hydrograph method, as
illustrated below. Observe that the S-hydrograph is obtained in 2 different
ways: a) in tabular form as the superposition of an infinite sequence of 1-h
UH's each lagged by 1-h; and b) as the cumulative volume of UH per unit time.
|
Time (h) |
UH (m3/s/cm) |
UH(t-1) (m3/s/cm) |
UH(t-2) (m3/s/cm) |
UH(t-3) |
UH(t-4) (m3/s/cm) |
UH(t-5) (m3/s/cm) |
UH(t-6) (m3/s/cm) |
UH(t-7) (m3/s/cm) |
UH(t-8) (m3/s/cm) |
UH(t-9) (m3/s/cm) |
S-Hydr. (m3/s/cm) |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
40 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
3 |
130 |
40 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
4 |
210 |
130 |
40 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
5 |
150 |
210 |
130 |
40 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
6 |
120 |
150 |
210 |
130 |
40 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
650 |
|
7 |
80 |
120 |
150 |
210 |
130 |
40 |
0 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
8 |
40 |
80 |
120 |
150 |
210 |
130 |
40 |
0 |
|
|
770 |
|
9 |
15 |
40 |
80 |
120 |
150 |
210 |
130 |
40 |
0 |
|
785 |
|
10 |
0 |
15 |
40 |
80 |
120 |
150 |
210 |
130 |
40 |
0 |
785 |
|
11 |
|
0 |
15 |
40 |
80 |
120 |
150 |
210 |
130 |
40 |
785 |
|
12 |
|
|
0 |
15 |
40 |
80 |
120 |
150 |
210 |
130 |
785 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
0 |
15 |
40 |
80 |
120 |
150 |
210 |
785 |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
15 |
40 |
80 |
120 |
150 |
785 |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
15 |
40 |
80 |
120 |
785 |
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
15 |
40 |
80 |
785 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
15 |
40 |
785 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
15 |
785 |
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
785 |

|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Time (h) |
1-h UH (m3/s/cm) |
S-Hyd (m3/s/cm) |
Lagged S-Hyd (m3/s/cm) |
S1-S2 (m3/s/cm) |
D'-UH (m3/s/cm) |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
40 |
40 |
|
40 |
13.33333 |
|
3 |
130 |
170 |
|
170 |
56.66667 |
|
4 |
210 |
380 |
0 |
380 |
126.6667 |
|
5 |
150 |
530 |
40 |
490 |
163.3333 |
|
6 |
120 |
650 |
170 |
480 |
160 |
|
7 |
80 |
730 |
380 |
350 |
116.6667 |
|
8 |
40 |
770 |
530 |
240 |
80 |
|
9 |
15 |
785 |
650 |
135 |
45 |
|
10 |
0 |
785 |
730 |
55 |
18.33333 |
|
11 |
|
785 |
770 |
15 |
5 |
|
12 |
|
785 |
785 |
0 |
0 |
|
13 |
|
785 |
785 |
0 |
0 |
|
14 |
|
785 |
785 |
0 |
0 |

3.
Determine
the volume of each ERH pulse, Pm,
expressed in units of equivalent depth:
|
Time (h) |
Pm (cm) |
|
0 - 3 |
3.0 |
|
3 - 6 |
6.0 |
|
6 - 9 |
4.5 |
4.
Use
superposition and proportionality principles:
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
Time(h) |
UH (m3/s/cm) |
P1*UH (m3/s) |
P2*UH (m3/s) |
P3*UH (m3/s) |
DRH (m3/s) |
Total (m3/s) |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
150 |
|
2 |
13.33333 |
40 |
|
|
40 |
190 |
|
3 |
56.66667 |
170 |
|
|
170 |
320 |
|
4 |
126.6667 |
380 |
0 |
|
380 |
530 |
|
5 |
163.3333 |
490 |
80 |
|
570 |
720 |
|
6 |
160 |
480 |
340 |
|
820 |
970 |
|
7 |
116.6667 |
350 |
760 |
0 |
1110 |
1260 |
|
8 |
80 |
240 |
980 |
60 |
1280 |
1430 |
|
9 |
45 |
135 |
960 |
255 |
1350 |
1500 |
|
10 |
18.33333 |
55 |
700 |
570 |
1325 |
1475 |
|
11 |
5 |
15 |
480 |
735 |
1230 |
1380 |
|
12 |
0 |
0 |
270 |
720 |
990 |
1140 |
|
13 |
|
|
110 |
525 |
635 |
785 |
|
14 |
|
|
30 |
360 |
390 |
540 |
|
15 |
|
|
0 |
202.5 |
202.5 |
352.5 |
|
16 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
82.5 |
232.5 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
22.5 |
172.5 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
150 |

a) Columns 2 - 4: Apply the proportionality
principle to scale the UH by the actual volume of the corresponding rectangular
pulse, Pm. Observe that
the resulting hydrographs are lagged so that their origins coincide with the
time of occurrence of the corresponding rainfall pulse.
b) Column 5: Apply the superposition
principle to obtain the DRH by summing up Columns 2 - 4.
c) Column 6: Add back the baseflow in order
to obtain the Total Streamflow Hydrograph.
4. The table below presents the recession
limb of a total streamflow hydrograph from a basin. Use the tabulated data to
obtain the groundwater recession constant k
for this basin.
|
Time (h) |
Streamflow Hydrograph (m3/s) |
|
10 |
2500 |
|
11 |
2300 |
|
12 |
2010 |
|
13 |
1645 |
|
14 |
995 |
|
15 |
600 |
|
16 |
370 |
|
17 |
220 |
|
18 |
135 |
|
19 |
80 |
|
20 |
50 |

Assuming
that the basin responds as a linear reservoir, the recession limb of the
hydrograph is described by the following:
![]()
where
k is the recession constant of the
system. Observe that this equation is linear in the semi-log domain:
![]()
Therefore,
the recession constant k can be estimated as the negative of the slope of a
least-squares fit to the pairs ((t-to),
lnQ(t)). This is accomplished below.
|
Time (h) |
Streamflow Hydrograph (m3/s) |
ln(Q(t)) |
|
10 |
2500 |
7.824046 |
|
11 |
2300 |
7.740664 |
|
12 |
2010 |
7.60589 |
|
13 |
1645 |
7.405496 |
|
14 |
995 |
6.902743 |
|
15 |
600 |
6.39693 |
|
16 |
370 |
5.913503 |
|
17 |
220 |
5.393628 |
|
18 |
135 |
4.905275 |
|
19 |
80 |
4.382027 |
|
20 |
50 |
3.912023 |
However,
given that there are several distinct storages in a basin, the recession limb
of hydrographs includes contributions from all of those storages. Thus, the
procedure outlined above can be used sequentially to obtain the corresponding
recession constants for each one of the storages (e.g., groundwater storage, subsurface storage). The existence of
the different storages is easily observable in the semi-log domain as shown
below.
In the graph below, observe that the
slowest portion of the recession starts at time t = 14 h. Thus, we can use the streamflow data for t > 14 h to estimate the groundwater
recession constant. Using least squares on ((t-to),
lnQ(t)), t > 14 h, the recession constant is obtained as k = 0.5.
